Kicking the online social networking habit - update

Just over two months ago I came out and said I was taking a break from my online social network on Ecademy. Unlike many New Year resolutions, I've stuck to this one. So what's happened?

Well I was expecting to have at least an hour more of spare time a day freed up. Somehow or other that hasn't happened. I occasionally dip into an Ecademy spin-off called Last Thursday but it rarely holds my attention for more than a couple of minutes at most. I have certainly spent more time on the forum at Luminous Landscape, which is really an excellent site with some outstanding contributors and discussions on photography and art; but that's no more than 10-15 minutes a day. And I've occasionally dipped into a Skype chat with old Ecademy contacts.

However, though I don't feel as if I have more time, I do feel a bit less fragmented and a bit more at ease with myself. But what about business.

Ecademy is a business-oriented social network, so being away from Ecademy might have been expected to have a negative impact on business. But no. I did a day for a new client in January (an Ecademy contact), I've just started working with a new client in Holland (a long-standing friend from pre-Ecademy days) and there is something brewing with a new business locally - thanks to a contact from my local Academy for Chief Executives Group 33 run by Mike Wilsher.

So all in all, I'm pleased with my decision to take a break. It's freed up mental and emotional space for other activities. It's enabled me to become more focused. It's given me the satisfaction of overcoming a compulsion. And it's given me a bigger perspective on the benefits and disbenefits of online networking.

I don't regret a moment of my Ecademy activities, and I would certainly recommend it to the right sort of person. Whether I return, and how, remain open questions.

"Communicating emotion" - enough already!

People talk a lot about "communicating emotion" through creative works - music, painting, photography etc. Personally, I find the "emotions" thing a bit twee, a bit illusory and certainly very self-centered. For me, the question is what is the "state" elicited by a particular work in people who are seeing it or hearing it?

Talking images, for example, I find a perfectly-executed portrait or landscape or product shot generally tends to elicit what I would call a completed state; I may linger and look at the detail, I may think "that's nice" or "great image" and I may even get excited or I may laugh, but I end up feeling that I've "got it" and moving on. The loop of noticing, looking, processing, and understanding closes.

What interests me far more are images that elicit an incompleted state, where the loop remains open - especially photos that are ambiguous or don't strictly confirm to the normal criteria of technical excellence. A photo that has the mojo evokes what feels like a (neurological) state of potential, of receptivity; I'm not just "consuming" the photo passively, and I'm just not doing a technical appraisal of it. Somehow the photo sets off a cascade of conscious and unconscious activity, mental, emotional ... maybe even spiritual.